Consciousness & Philosophy of Mind

← Back to Domain-Specific Families

Abstractions about consciousness, mental causation, materialism, phenomenal concepts, cognitive architecture, temporal experience, and mind–world relations.

13 abstractions in this family — domain-specific abstractions that sit near one another in structural-signature space (k-means over structural-signature embeddings). Each is shown with its short description.

• Apprehension (understanding) — The mental act of becoming aware of or conceiving an object without yet affirming or denying anything about it.
• B-theory of time — The tenseless view that temporal relations such as earlier than and later than are fundamental while no objectively privileged present or passage exists.
• Causal closure — A metaphysical thesis that every physical event with a cause sufficient for its occurrence has a sufficient physical cause within the physical domain.
• Consciousness causes collapse — A historical quantum interpretation proposing that conscious observation triggers wavefunction collapse.
• Emergent materialism — A philosophy-of-mind position holding that mental properties depend entirely on material systems yet arise as novel, irreducible higher-level properties with autonomous explanatory laws.
• Epiphenomenalism — The philosophy-of-mind view that physical processes cause mental events while mental events exert no causal influence on physical events.
• Global workspace theory — A cognitive architecture in which selected information becomes conscious by being globally broadcast to many specialized unconscious processes.
• Hard problem of consciousness — The philosophical problem of explaining why and how physical or functional processing is accompanied by subjective phenomenal experience.
• Language of thought hypothesis — The hypothesis that cognition operates over an internal language-like system of compositional mental representations with combinatorial syntax and semantics.
• Neutral monism — Hold that ultimate reality has one fundamental kind whose intrinsic nature is neither mental nor physical, while mental and physical phenomena are derivative organizations or aspects of that neutral basis.
• Phenomenal concept strategy — A physicalist response to consciousness arguments that locates the apparent explanatory gap in special concepts used to think about experience rather than in an ontological gap.
• Psychophysical parallelism — A philosophy-of-mind position holding that mental and bodily event streams correspond systematically without directly causing one another.
• User illusion — The metaphor that conscious experience is a simplified action-oriented interface generated from hidden processing rather than a transparent display of objective reality.