Skip to content

Social objects

Social objects are objects that gain meaning through processes of reification (e.g. ritual).

Version
v1 · 2026-09-28 · History
Domain-specific #
12118
Domain group
Social Sciences
Origin domain
Sociology & Anthropology
Subdomains
Social Ontology, Object Centered Sociality → Sociology & Anthropology

Core Idea

Social objects is treated here as the recurring cross-domain formal modeling identity summarized by this source-grounded definition: Social objects are objects that gain meaning through processes of reification (e.g. ritual). Social objects are objects that gain meaning through processes of reification (e.g. ritual). Studies of this phenomenon have its origins in classical cognitive sociology, the historical traditions of the sociology of knowledge and phenomenology. A prominent work in this regard is The Rules of the Sociological Method, in which Emile Durkheim suggested the dictum, "The first and most basic rule is to consider.

Scope of Application

  • Documented setting. A prominent work in this regard is The Rules of the Sociological Method, in which Emile Durkheim suggested the dictum, "The first and most basic rule is to consider social facts.

  • Documented setting. Social objects are objects that gain meaning through processes of reification (e.g. ritual).

  • Documented setting. Studies of this phenomenon have its origins in classical cognitive sociology, the historical traditions of the sociology of knowledge and phenomenology.

  • Documented setting. Actor-network theory has developed this concept as the object around which social networks form.

  • Documented setting. This version was applied to social media networks by Jyri Engeström in 2005 as part of the explanation of why some social media networks succeed and some fail.

Clarity

A clear use of Social objects names the carrier, the operative relation, and the conditions under which the source treats the identity as present. The minimal definition is Social objects are objects that gain meaning through processes of reification (e.g. ritual). The strongest recognition evidence in the frozen account is: Studies of this phenomenon have its origins in classical cognitive sociology, the historical traditions of the sociology of knowledge.

Manages Complexity

Social objects compresses multiple cross-domain formal modeling details into a stable diagnostic relation. The source shows both the central mechanism—this version was applied to social media networks by Jyri Engeström in 2005 as part of the explanation of why some social media networks succeed and some fail.—and the practical consequence—engeström maintained that "Social network theory fails to recognise such real-world dynamics because its notion of sociality is.

Abstract Reasoning

  1. Type the carrier. Identify the cross-domain formal modeling entities to which the claim applies.
  2. State the relation. Use the source-grounded identity: Social objects are objects that gain meaning through processes of reification (e.g. ritual).
  3. Check operation and conditions. The concept was popularized by Hugh MacLeod, cartoonist and social observer in 2007.
  4. Demand recognition evidence. Studies of this phenomenon have its origins in classical cognitive sociology, the historical traditions of the sociology of knowledge and phenomenology.
  5. Test variation.

Knowledge Transfer

Within the home domain. Knowledge about Social objects transfers literally when a new case preserves the same carrier type, relation, and recognition test. A prominent work in this regard is The Rules of the Sociological Method, in which Emile Durkheim suggested the dictum, "The first and most basic rule is to consider social facts as things." This has led researchers to investigate the social and cultural contingencies of how "objects" cognitively become objects. Social objects are objects that gain meaning through processes of reification (e.g. ritual).

Relationships to Other Abstractions

Local relationship map for Social objectsParents appear above the current abstraction, mutual partners to the right, and children below. Node labels state whether each abstraction is prime or domain-specific; colors identify relation types.Social objectsDOMAINPrime abstraction: Meaning — presupposesMeaningPRIMEPrime abstraction: Reification — presupposesReificationPRIME

Current abstraction Social objects Domain-specific

Parents (2) — more general patterns this builds on

  • Social objects presupposes Meaning Prime

    Their identity depends on socially produced meaning.

  • Social objects presupposes Reification Prime

    Social objects acquire object-like identity through reifying social practice.

Hierarchy paths (2) — routes to 1 parentless root

Neighborhood in Abstraction Space

Social objects sits in a moderately populated region (51st percentile for distinctiveness): it has near-neighbors but no dense thicket of look-alikes.

Family — Sociological Theories & Concepts (21 abstractions)

Nearest neighbors

Computed from structural-signature embeddings · 2026-10-08