Uncertainty, Evidence & Inference Failure¶
← Back to mechanisms by problem
A belief, claim, explanation, forecast, comparison, or causal conclusion is not adequately warranted by the available evidence and assumptions.
This problem family contains 101 solution archetypes and 829 mechanisms. Choose a more specific problem pattern below; each subfamily page drills into the mechanisms inherited from its archetypes. Click a column header to sort.
| Problem subfamily | Mechanisms | Archetypes | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belief Bias, Confidence & Revision Governance | 64 | 9 | Affect, anchors, identity, familiarity, consensus assumptions, and domain overreach distort confidence or prevent warranted belief revision. |
| Causal, Counterfactual & Attribution Validity | 79 | 9 | Association or observed outcome is assigned causal meaning without a mechanism, valid counterfactual, confounder control, or correct level of change. |
| Comparator, Value, Demand & Outcome Calibration | 74 | 8 | Performance, demand, preference, regret, and realized outcomes lack a legitimate feasible benchmark that accounts for risk, constraints, and selection. |
| Evidence Fusion, Correlation & Expert Aggregation | 82 | 10 | Multiple signals, sources, models, or experts are combined without reliability weights, independence checks, shared-lineage controls, or conflict handling. |
| Evidence Warrant, Source & Observation Chain | 84 | 10 | Observations, absences, reports, reputations, and sources are treated as self-evident proof without an explicit chain from trace to claim. |
| Experimental Comparison & Hypothesis-Test Design | 91 | 9 | Treatment, control, assignment, blinding, power, and evidence thresholds are insufficiently designed to support the intended comparison. |
| Explanatory Hypothesis, Pattern & Case Reasoning | 75 | 11 | Partial or recurring observations are forced into a favored explanation, analogy, pattern, or universal before alternatives and boundary cases are tested. |
| Forecast, Scenario, Assumption & Sensitivity Uncertainty | 69 | 8 | Plans and forecasts hide assumption dependence, alternative futures, reference-class evidence, revision conditions, and uncertainty ranges. |
| Premature Release & Missing Robustness Evidence | 27 | 5 | A product, policy, intervention, or dose commits before real-context tests, perturbations, edge scenarios, and response evidence validate its operating logic. |
| Probability, Distribution & Risk Calibration | 58 | 7 | Probability, uncertainty intervals, tails, multiplicity, and variability are interpreted under hidden frames or assumptions that misstate risk. |
| Sampling, Selection, Missingness & Generalization | 65 | 8 | Observed cases differ systematically from the target because entry, dropout, missingness, case choice, or reuse beyond the sampled domain is ungoverned. |
| Temporal Process, Nonstationarity & Trend Inference | 61 | 7 | Historical and sequential evidence is treated as stable, deterministic, or self-explanatory despite drift, dependence, trends, survival conditioning, and time ordering. |