The Return of Industrial Warfare¶
Vershinin, A. (2022). The Return of Industrial Warfare. Royal United Services Institute.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Attrition Warfare
- First World War operational analysis — the canonical home: Verdun's explicit "bleed France white" design and the Allied victory over Central-Powers economic and manpower capacity, the case where the operational-versus-strategic distinction is sharpest. Civil War / Overland-Campaign strategy — Grant's continuous-pressure attrition of Lee once Confederate manpower replacement was exhausted, the manpower-ledger instance. Soviet deep-operation doctrine — the Eastern Front's sustained attritional pressure on Wehrmacht forces, layering manoeuvre and attrition. Contemporary attritional war analysis — the Russia-Ukraine war's munitions, vehicles, and personnel depletion analysis, where both sides' theories of victory are framed in depletion-rate terms
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“The massive consumption of equipment, vehicles and ammunition requires a large-scale industrial base for resupply”
- First World War operational analysis — the canonical home: Verdun's explicit "bleed France white" design and the Allied victory over Central-Powers economic and manpower capacity, the case where the operational-versus-strategic distinction is sharpest. Civil War / Overland-Campaign strategy — Grant's continuous-pressure attrition of Lee once Confederate manpower replacement was exhausted, the manpower-ledger instance. Soviet deep-operation doctrine — the Eastern Front's sustained attritional pressure on Wehrmacht forces, layering manoeuvre and attrition. Contemporary attritional war analysis — the Russia-Ukraine war's munitions, vehicles, and personnel depletion analysis, where both sides' theories of victory are framed in depletion-rate terms
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0330a6a9c0b4 · see in the full table