Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990¶
United States Congress. (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Predicate
- A disability-protection statute turns on a predicate: does this individual have an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity?
This sourceDefines disability as a compound predicate — an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity — whose 'substantially' boundary is litigated.
- A disability-protection statute turns on a predicate: does this individual have an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity?
Domain-specific¶
- Accessibility
- the practice spread nationally and was later mandated under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended”
- the practice spread nationally and was later mandated under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mechanisms¶
- Minimum Service or Quality Floor
- … is that it protects the conditions that must never be laundered through an aggregate — the reason a serious selection separates a conjunctive floor from a compensatory score, exactly as a legal accessibility mandate such as the Americans with Disabilities Act functions as a floor rather than a factor to be weighed.
This sourceEstablishes enforceable accessibility and nondiscrimination requirements rather than optional weighted preferences.
- … is that it protects the conditions that must never be laundered through an aggregate — the reason a serious selection separates a conjunctive floor from a compensatory score, exactly as a legal accessibility mandate such as the Americans with Disabilities Act functions as a floor rather than a factor to be weighed.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:0361ca67f078 · see in the full table