Naturalistic Inquiry¶
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.
Cited by¶
7 citations across 7 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- External Analytic Challenge
- Reasoning that can still be changed is deliberately handed to someone competent enough to engage its substance and positioned outside the frame that produced it; that person is required to probe it rather than react to it; and whatever comes back must either alter the work or be answered on the record — all of it completed while altering the work is still cheaper than carrying it forward.
This sourceSpecifies peer debriefing, an exchange with a disinterested peer outside the inquiry that probes the working while the inquiry is still open rather than delivering a verdict on it afterwards.
- Reasoning that can still be changed is deliberately handed to someone competent enough to engage its substance and positioned outside the frame that produced it; that person is required to probe it rather than react to it; and whatever comes back must either alter the work or be answered on the record — all of it completed while altering the work is still cheaper than carrying it forward.
- Grain of Analysis
- The statistical insight that grain-level resolution must be earned against held-out structure ports to qualitative research as the discipline of not creating a new code without evidence the data warrants it, with member-checking as the qualitative analogue of held-out validation.
This sourceEstablishes member-checking (verifying interpretations with participants) as a credibility/trustworthiness technique for qualitative research — the recovery/validity test for coded interpretation, analogous to held-out validation.
- The statistical insight that grain-level resolution must be earned against held-out structure ports to qualitative research as the discipline of not creating a new code without evidence the data warrants it, with member-checking as the qualitative analogue of held-out validation.
- Negative Case Analysis
- Qualitative social science (origin): negative case analysis is named as a trustworthiness criterion in interpretivist research and is constitutive of deviant-case selection in grounded theory.
This sourceNames negative case analysis as a trustworthiness/credibility criterion in naturalistic research — revising the working hypothesis to account for cases that do not fit; the origin reference.
- Qualitative social science (origin): negative case analysis is named as a trustworthiness criterion in interpretivist research and is constitutive of deviant-case selection in grounded theory.
Domain-specific¶
Mechanisms¶
- Comparative Case Review Panel
- The discipline that guards against this is to keep each challenge tied to evidence the analytic mechanisms can actually check, to record dissent rather than average it away, and to treat member-endorsement as a validity check
This sourceTreats member checking as a key technique for testing interpretations and establishing qualitative credibility.
- The discipline that guards against this is to keep each challenge tied to evidence the analytic mechanisms can actually check, to record dissent rather than average it away, and to treat member-endorsement as a validity check
- Reflexive Field and Decision Log
- Transferability Claim Check
- Its strength is that it is the last guard against transferability overclaim: it aligns the write-up's confidence with its evidence, keeping the account's reach to what the cases support and leaving generalization, properly, as a judgment the reader makes with a bounded claim in hand.
This sourcePlaces transferability judgment with the reader while requiring contextual description and bounded working hypotheses from the investigator.
- Its strength is that it is the last guard against transferability overclaim: it aligns the write-up's confidence with its evidence, keeping the account's reach to what the cases support and leaving generalization, properly, as a judgment the reader makes with a bounded claim in hand.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 4 other ways.
- https://search.worldcat.org/title/Naturalistic-inquiry/oclc/11467836 ×1
- https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/naturalistic-inquiry/book842 ×1
- https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/naturalistic-inquiry/book842 ×1
- https://www.sagepub.com/en-gb/asi/book/naturalistic-inquiry ×1
Registry ID ref:0ee4be95e95a · see in the full table