Minneapolis 2040¶
Minneapolis, C. o. (2019). Minneapolis 2040: The City's Comprehensive Plan.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Infill Development
- The Minneapolis 2040 comprehensive plan, sent for regional review in 2018 and finalized in 2019, operationalized infill at the finest grain by ending single-family-only zoning citywide: every residential lot became eligible for up to a duplex or triplex by right.
This sourceThe adopted comprehensive plan that ended single-family-only zoning citywide, making every residential lot eligible for up to a triplex by right.
- The Minneapolis 2040 comprehensive plan, sent for regional review in 2018 and finalized in 2019, operationalized infill at the finest grain by ending single-family-only zoning citywide: every residential lot became eligible for up to a duplex or triplex by right.
- Zoning
- Minneapolis's City Council voted in December 2018 to send its Minneapolis 2040 comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council for review, and the city finalized the plan in October 2019; the accompanying zoning changes, effective January 2020, made it the first major U.S. city to end single-family-only zoning citywide, permitting up to three dwelling units (triplexes) by right on lots previously restricted to a single detached house
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“increase housing choice and supply by allowing up to three dwelling units on an individual lot”
- Minneapolis's City Council voted in December 2018 to send its Minneapolis 2040 comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council for review, and the city finalized the plan in October 2019; the accompanying zoning changes, effective January 2020, made it the first major U.S. city to end single-family-only zoning citywide, permitting up to three dwelling units (triplexes) by right on lots previously restricted to a single detached house
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:215cacfb39e0 · see in the full table