The Social Construction of What?¶
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What?. Harvard University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Classification
- This clarity highlights three things: (1) classification is active and ongoing, not passive or finished (reclassification happens when categories change or evidence shifts); (2) classification systems are human decisions, designed by people with particular purposes, subject to revision; (3) the same entity can be classified differently under different systems (a person might be classified as "high-risk criminal" under a criminal-justice classification, "low-income" under a wealth classification, and "uninsured" under a health-insurance classification), as Hacking (1999) develops in his philosophical analysis of "looping kinds" and the dynamic, human-designed character of classification.
This sourcePhilosophical analysis of classification as an active, ongoing, human-designed practice; develops "looping kinds" / interactive kinds in which categorized people respond to and reshape the categories themselves.
- This clarity highlights three things: (1) classification is active and ongoing, not passive or finished (reclassification happens when categories change or evidence shifts); (2) classification systems are human decisions, designed by people with particular purposes, subject to revision; (3) the same entity can be classified differently under different systems (a person might be classified as "high-risk criminal" under a criminal-justice classification, "low-income" under a wealth classification, and "uninsured" under a health-insurance classification), as Hacking (1999) develops in his philosophical analysis of "looping kinds" and the dynamic, human-designed character of classification.
- Reification
- The shape recurs again in qualitative research (a designer-built theme treated as a found pattern), in linguistics (cluster labels like race or personality type read as joints in nature),
This sourceExamines how constructed classifications of people are read as joints in nature, the categorical case of reification.
- The shape recurs again in qualitative research (a designer-built theme treated as a found pattern), in linguistics (cluster labels like race or personality type read as joints in nature),
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:45910b931760 · see in the full table