Joint Publication 3-0: Joint Operations¶
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2017). Joint Publication 3-0: Joint Operations: Joint Operations.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
Domain-specific¶
- Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown
- flagged in Katrina, Deepwater Horizon, and 2017-season after-action reviews. Multi-agency law enforcement operations — federal, state, and local agencies on incompatible incident-tracking systems producing duplicated effort and gaps, remedied by a shared operational dashboard. Military joint operations — the doctrinally specified joint common operational picture (JCOP), whose breakdown is studied across exercises and multi-domain-operations literature
This sourceJoint doctrine's definition and use of the common operational picture as a single identical display shared across commands.
- flagged in Katrina, Deepwater Horizon, and 2017-season after-action reviews. Multi-agency law enforcement operations — federal, state, and local agencies on incompatible incident-tracking systems producing duplicated effort and gaps, remedied by a shared operational dashboard. Military joint operations — the doctrinally specified joint common operational picture (JCOP), whose breakdown is studied across exercises and multi-domain-operations literature
- Operational Pause
- In US joint doctrine (JP 3-0), the operational pause is the instrument by which a commander manages the approach to the culminating point
This sourceThe doctrinal status of the operational pause as the instrument for managing the approach to the culminating point.
- In US joint doctrine (JP 3-0), the operational pause is the instrument by which a commander manages the approach to the culminating point
- Supporting Effort
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:4764137120f2 · see in the full table