Memoing¶
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Memoing. Theoretical Sensitivity.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Grounded Theory Sampling Memo
- Its strength is that the memoing discipline is what keeps theoretical sampling reconstructable and honest: each selection carries a written, pre-dated reason tied to the model state, so the sequence can later be shown to have followed the analysis rather than the analyst's hunches.
This sourceSampling memos in particular record why the next case is being sought, which is what makes theoretical sampling accountable rather than opportunistic.
- Its strength is that the memoing discipline is what keeps theoretical sampling reconstructable and honest: each selection carries a written, pre-dated reason tied to the model state, so the sequence can later be shown to have followed the analysis rather than the analyst's hunches.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5613ffe327da · see in the full table