Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. International Universities Press.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

1976

Link

https://archive.org/details/cognitivetherapy0000beck_e3y7

Cited from

psychology

Cited by

4 citations across 4 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Emotional Reasoning
  • Emotional reasoning appears in Beck (1976) and Burns (1980) as one of approximately 10-15 canonical cognitive distortions.

    This sourceFoundational operationalization of cognitive reframing as core mechanism of cognitive therapy; introduces "automatic thoughts" and cognitive restructuring. Beck 1976 foundational source for cognitive-reframing mechanism.

• Schema

  • This sourceFoundational operationalization of cognitive reframing as core mechanism of cognitive therapy; introduces "automatic thoughts" and cognitive restructuring. Beck 1976 foundational source for cognitive-reframing mechanism.

Domain-specific

• Cognitive Reframing
  • The downstream allocation of resources, attention, and hiring then follows the new frame.

    This sourceFoundational operationalization of cognitive reframing as the core mechanism of cognitive therapy; introduces 'automatic thoughts' and cognitive restructuring (identify automatic negative cognitions, test against evidence, generate alternatives).

• Slippery Slope
  • One is a proof; the other is an asserted cascade. Not catastrophizing. Catastrophizing is affect-driven inflation of worst-case anticipation — a cognitive pattern about prediction under fear.

    This sourceBeck's account of catastrophizing as a characteristic cognitive pattern of anxious patients who equate the hypothesis with the feared outcome.

    Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source

    “A characteristic of catastrophizing is that the person equates the hypothesis with”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 4 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:568b9271f182 · see in the full table