Nebraska v. Iowa, 143 U.S. 359 (1892)¶
(1892). Nebraska v. Iowa, 143 U.S. 359 (1892).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Immaterial Spatial Entity
- The Court drew a distinction that treats the boundary as an entity with its own history: where the river migrates gradually by accretion (imperceptible deposition of soil), the boundary moves with the channel; where the river jumps suddenly by avulsion (a flood cutting a new course), the boundary stays on the old bed
SupportedVerified against a saved copy of the source
“STATE OF NEBRASKA v. STATE OF LOWA.”
- The Court drew a distinction that treats the boundary as an entity with its own history: where the river migrates gradually by accretion (imperceptible deposition of soil), the boundary moves with the channel; where the river jumps suddenly by avulsion (a flood cutting a new course), the boundary stays on the old bed
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5a631b7a3474 · see in the full table