Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives¶
Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1).
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Context-Dependent Preference
- Absent that, there is nothing beyond arithmetic.
This sourceShows that adding an asymmetrically dominated alternative can increase the probability of choosing the option that dominates it, the regularity violation that separates reordering from mere redistribution.
- Absent that, there is nothing beyond arithmetic.
Domain-specific¶
- Decoy Effect
- Huber, Payne, and Puto (1982) documented it systematically across consumer-goods categories
This sourceThe original systematic demonstration in consumer choice: 'an asymmetrically dominated alternative is dominated by one item in the set but not by another. Adding such an alternative to a choice set can increase the probability of choosing the item that dominates it'. The seminal demonstration of the effect and the source of the term 'asymmetric dominance'.
- Huber, Payne, and Puto (1982) documented it systematically across consumer-goods categories
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:737d5893510b · see in the full table