Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing¶
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Evidence-Fidelity Decay
- The fourth is to audit fidelity by re-capture: ask the witness again later, re-interview the survivor, re-listen to the meeting tape against the cable, spot-check labels against the source artefact.
This sourceStructured re-interview protocol (context reinstatement, report-everything, varied retrieval order) that re-elicits eyewitness memory — a re-capture/fidelity-audit method for delayed recollection.
- The fourth is to audit fidelity by re-capture: ask the witness again later, re-interview the survivor, re-listen to the meeting tape against the cable, spot-check labels against the source artefact.
Mechanisms¶
- Delayed Interview Protocol
- Structured elicitation techniques such as the cognitive interview
This sourcePresents the cognitive interview as a structured elicitation method and reports that it recovers more correct information than standard police interviews.
- Structured elicitation techniques such as the cognitive interview
- Vantage-Bias Interview Protocol
- It draws on the cognitive interview, the forensic technique that improves recall by reinstating context and avoiding leading questions rather than pressing the witness.
This sourcePresents the cognitive interview as a forensic recall technique using context reinstatement and open, non-leading questioning.
- It draws on the cognitive interview, the forensic technique that improves recall by reinstating context and avoiding leading questions rather than pressing the witness.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
- https://search.worldcat.org/title/Memory-enhancing-techniques-for-investigative-interviewing-%3A-the-cognitive-interview/oclc/760683571 ×1
- https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/memory-enhancing-techniques-investigative-interviewing-cognitive ×1
Registry ID ref:77d323109561 · see in the full table