Qualitative Quality¶
Tracy. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Thin Description
- Interpretive ethnography carries a long, heterogeneous list of craft virtues — positionality, member meaning, situatedness, reflexive layering, audit trail, immersion, "richness" — each held up as something a good account must have, so that judging or repairing a thin write-up turns into adding more of everything and hoping the unease lifts.
This sourceA model of quality in qualitative research that consolidates eight markers - worthy topic, rich rigor, sincerity, credibility, resonance, significant contribution, ethics and meaningful coherence.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“Then the author presents and explores eight key markers of quality in qualitative research including (a) worthy topic, (b) rich rigor, (c) sincerity, (d) credibility, (e) resonance, (f) significant contribution, (g) ethics, and (h) meaningful coherence.”
- Interpretive ethnography carries a long, heterogeneous list of craft virtues — positionality, member meaning, situatedness, reflexive layering, audit trail, immersion, "richness" — each held up as something a good account must have, so that judging or repairing a thin write-up turns into adding more of everything and hoping the unease lifts.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7ba3466e0c0e · see in the full table