Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics¶
Tetlock, P. E., Belkin, & Aaron. (1996). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Critical Juncture
- A random event (a meteor strike, a random mutation) may have large consequences, but a critical juncture involves meaningful choice—agency, deliberation, or selection pressure—at the moment of branching, a methodological commitment Tetlock and Belkin (1996) build into their framework for disciplined counterfactual reasoning in world politics.
This sourceCriteria for distinguishing plausible from implausible counterfactuals; grounds critical-juncture analysis in meaningful agency rather than pure randomness; supports the not-mere-randomness claim.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The publisher's page for this volume confirms a framework for assessing counterfactual arguments about world politics, but states no commitment about critical junctures, agency, or randomness.
“Taken together, these essays go a long way toward establishing a more nuanced and rigorous framework for assessing counterfactual arguments about world politics in particular and about the social sciences more broadly.”
- A random event (a meteor strike, a random mutation) may have large consequences, but a critical juncture involves meaningful choice—agency, deliberation, or selection pressure—at the moment of branching, a methodological commitment Tetlock and Belkin (1996) build into their framework for disciplined counterfactual reasoning in world politics.
Mechanisms¶
- Counterfactual Actor-Substitution Probe
- Apply a minimal rewrite. Change only the occupant and let consequences follow; do not quietly also change the circumstances to make the point.
This sourcePresents the minimal-rewrite discipline: alter as little of the antecedent situation as possible and trace consequences without covertly changing surrounding conditions.
- Apply a minimal rewrite. Change only the occupant and let consequences follow; do not quietly also change the circumstances to make the point.
- Counterfactual Breakpoint Analysis
- Then at each node it runs the counterfactual as a minimal, plausible rewrite — change one decision to an alternative that genuinely existed then, hold everything prior fixed, and trace forward.
This sourceSets out minimal-rewrite, historical-consistency, and projectability tests for disciplined counterfactual analysis.
- Then at each node it runs the counterfactual as a minimal, plausible rewrite — change one decision to an alternative that genuinely existed then, hold everything prior fixed, and trace forward.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:83b35b69f9ca · see in the full table