Analysis of Time-Dependent Hydrophobic Recovery on Plasma-Treated Superhydrophobic Polypropylene Using XPS and Wettability Measurements¶
Vámos, C., Füredi, M., Hórvölgyi, Z., Krafcsik, O., Kiss, G., Bárány, T., & Marosfői, B. B. (2024). Analysis of Time-Dependent Hydrophobic Recovery on Plasma-Treated Superhydrophobic Polypropylene Using XPS and Wettability Measurements. Scientific Reports.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Preparatory Field Conditioning
- Its mechanism differs, and so does its shape: a treated polymer surface loses wettability along a smooth exponential, a suppressed radar returns in a step when a spare is trucked forward, and a briefed committee degrades slowly and then discontinuously when a member is replaced.
This sourceTracks the wettability gained by plasma treatment decaying continuously over days of ageing -- fastest immediately after treatment and then slowing -- and fits an exponential form to the resulting wetting behaviour.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The paper shows plasma-induced wettability fading fastest at first then slowing, but its exponential fit describes droplet spreading, and it has nothing on radars or committees.
“the rate of hydrophobic recovery is faster at the beginning of ageing and, after two days, slows”
- Its mechanism differs, and so does its shape: a treated polymer surface loses wettability along a smooth exponential, a suppressed radar returns in a step when a spare is trucked forward, and a briefed committee degrades slowly and then discontinuously when a member is replaced.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9dff4d3a4efd · see in the full table