An Introduction to the Overton Window of Political Possibilities.¶
Russell, N. J. (2006). An Introduction to the Overton Window of Political Possibilities. Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Acceptability Window Map
- The artifact draws directly on the idea of an Overton window — the band of positions currently within mainstream acceptability — and gives that abstraction concrete, actor-specific coordinates.
This sourceDefines the Overton window as the portion of a policy spectrum that is politically acceptable or possible at a given time.
- The artifact draws directly on the idea of an Overton window — the band of positions currently within mainstream acceptability — and gives that abstraction concrete, actor-specific coordinates.
- Discourse Boundary Labeling
- Repeated labeling of a position as fringe or out-of-scope narrows the space of respectable opinion — the Overton window
This sourceDefines the Overton Window as the limited range of policy ideas considered politically acceptable at a given time.
- Repeated labeling of a position as fringe or out-of-scope narrows the space of respectable opinion — the Overton window
- Overton-Window Position Scan
- The Overton window — the range of policies a public will currently accept, which advocates can shift over time — is the concept the whole method operationalizes.
This sourceDefines the Overton window as the currently politically acceptable range of policies and explains how changes in public opinion can shift it.
- The Overton window — the range of policies a public will currently accept, which advocates can shift over time — is the concept the whole method operationalizes.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a93f3ff05194 · see in the full table