Introduction to Classical Legal Rhetoric: A Lost Heritage¶
Frost, M. H. (2005). Introduction to Classical Legal Rhetoric: A Lost Heritage: A Lost Heritage. Ashgate.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Invention (Rhetorical Canon)
- That parent move genuinely travels, and its travels are visible: legal strategy's pre-trial issue-spotting (and the IRAC/CRAC frameworks descended from inventional topoi)
This sourceFrost's treatment of legal issue identification through the classical topics of invention (status theory). Frost's linking of legal issue identification to the classical topics of invention, framed as a lost heritage rather than a documented descent.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“Analysis: The Topics of Invention 25 Status Theory and [Issue] Identification Within the large categories of deductive”
- That parent move genuinely travels, and its travels are visible: legal strategy's pre-trial issue-spotting (and the IRAC/CRAC frameworks descended from inventional topoi)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b3a82589df0a · see in the full table