Attacking Faulty Reasoning¶
Damer, T. E. (2009). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Chronological Snobbery
- The fallacy has a mirror image — the appeal to tradition, or argumentum ad antiquitatem
This sourceDefines the appeal to tradition as a fallacy: persuading by reverence or respect for a tradition instead of by evidence.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The fallacy has a mirror image — the appeal to tradition, or argumentum ad antiquitatem
Mechanisms¶
- Selection / Omission Matrix
- By demanding the excluded column, it turns the fallacy of suppressed evidence — arguing from only the facts that favor a conclusion — into something a reviewer can see and fill.
This sourceDefines suppressed evidence as presenting support for a conclusion while omitting material counterevidence that bears against it.
- By demanding the excluded column, it turns the fallacy of suppressed evidence — arguing from only the facts that favor a conclusion — into something a reviewer can see and fill.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f84a9d68845f · see in the full table