Digital Evidence Preservation¶
Guttman, B., White, D. R., & Walraven, T. (2022). Digital Evidence Preservation: Considerations for Evidence Handlers.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
Mechanisms¶
- Actual Fact Ledger
- Handled like evidence — sourced, weighted, versioned — it behaves like a proper chain of custody for facts, and that provenance is what lets a later reviewer trust the baseline was not massaged.
This sourceRequires source documentation and integrity controls in a chain of custody so later reviewers can verify that preserved digital evidence was not changed.
- Handled like evidence — sourced, weighted, versioned — it behaves like a proper chain of custody for facts, and that provenance is what lets a later reviewer trust the baseline was not massaged.
- Triangulation Audit Trail
- It is the evidentiary analogue of a chain of custody
This sourceExplains that chain-of-custody documentation records evidence handling across its lifecycle so integrity and history can be demonstrated.
- It is the evidentiary analogue of a chain of custody
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d69bc0546fc8 · see in the full table