Skip to content

Rhetoric

← Back to Domain-Specific Abstractions by Origin Domain

87 domain-specific abstractions whose origin domain is Rhetoric. They span 61 subdomains — sort by that column to group them, or click any subdomain to filter to it.

AbstractionSubdomainDescription
Accismus—Accismus is a recurring rhetoric, social behavior identity in which a speaker or actor feigns refusal of something genuinely desired, often to display modesty or irony.
Ad Baculum (Appeal to Force)The fallacy of securing acceptance of a claim by threatening the listener rather than giving reasons bearing on its truth — a relevance error in which a payoff-altering signal is substituted for a truth-bearing one, so compliant assent and warranted belief come apart.
Ad HominemReject or discredit a claim by substituting an attack on its source — character, motives, circumstances, inconsistency, or affiliation — for evaluation of the claim and its evidence.
Ad Misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)Win acceptance of a claim by evoking sympathy or pity rather than supplying evidence, substituting an affective shift in the audience for epistemic support on a proposition that is independent of the speaker's circumstances.
Ad Nauseam (Argument from Repetition)Diagnose the fallacy of treating a claim as established by bare repetition, where frequency raises felt credibility through processing fluency while adding zero new evidential warrant.
Ad Populum (Appeal to the People)Name the fallacy of treating a claim as established by its popularity, and expose the defect with one test — did the believers independently weigh the same evidence, or inherit the belief through a social channel? — that separates warranted aggregation from an influence cascade wearing the same clothes.
Ad Verecundiam (Appeal to Authority)The informal fallacy of treating a claim as established by an authority's credential under conditions where the citation carries no evidential weight — the credential being a signal that load-bearing conditions (domain competence, evidence access, disinterest, convergence) hold, used as though it guaranteed what it only heuristically suggests.
AntithesisSharpen a contrast by fusing two primitives — parallel grammatical form and opposed content — so a matched syntactic frame delivers the opposition at a controlled, audible beat.
ApologiaAnalyze or build a defense of impugned conduct as a combination of four strategy primitives — denial, bolstering, differentiation, transcendence — where denial and transcendence are mutually exclusive, so mixing them produces an incoherent, self-damaging apologia.
Apostrophe (figure of speech)—A rhetorical turn in which a speaker breaks from the current audience to address an absent person, abstract idea or inanimate entity directly.
Appeal to consequencesThe fallacy of treating a proposition as true or false because accepting it would have desirable or undesirable consequences.
Appeal to probabilityDiagnose an argument that promotes mere possibility or nonzero probability into probability, inevitability, or actuality without the quantitative evidence or modal premise needed for that stronger conclusion.
AsyndetonA rhetorical construction that deliberately omits conjunctions between coordinated words or clauses to alter rhythm, emphasis, or memorability.
BulverismAssume an opponent's conclusion is false, then explain the psychological or sociological cause of their 'error' — substituting a genetic account of the belief for the logical evaluation that was owed.
CatachresisMarkedly nonconventional application of a word or phrase, whether a semantic misuse or a deliberately strained rhetorical figure.
Cherry PickingSelectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.
ChiasmusState two elements in one order and then restate them with their roles swapped (A-B, then B-A) across a pivot, so the crossed inversion silently asserts that the relation runs both ways.
Chronological SnobberyThe fallacy of dismissing a belief solely because it is old — substituting a temporal fact for a content-specific reason — corrected by Lewis's question of whether the view was actually refuted or merely fell out of fashion, with an age-as-credit mirror in appeal to tradition.
Circular ReasoningDiagnose an argument whose conclusion already appears among its premises by tracing its justification graph for a cycle that never touches a node the audience grants independently.
Commonplace bookA personal, retrievable collection of selected passages and notes assembled for later use rather than chronological self-narration.
Complex QuestionExpose a question that smuggles a contested claim in as its presupposition, so every direct answer silently ratifies the claim and the only sound reply is to refuse the frame.
ConcessionGrant a peripheral or indefensible part of the opposing case while continuing to contest the rest, purchasing credibility through costly-looking admission and, if the granted claim was not load-bearing, harvesting narrowing, burden-shift, and board-clearing at once.
Courtier's replyThe courtier's reply is a type of informal fallacy, coined by American biologist PZ Myers, in which a respondent to criticism claims that the critic lacks sufficient knowledge, credentials, or training to pose any sort of criticism whatsoever.
DigressionA digression is a bounded turn from a discourse line into distinguishable material before that line recognizably resumes.
DispositioArrange selected rhetorical material in an order fitted to the case, audience, and persuasive work of each part.
Emotive ConjugationEmotive conjugation grades descriptions of comparable conduct from flattering self-language to disparaging other-language across person-positioned clauses.
EpanodosEpanodos is a figure of speech used when the same word or two similar words are repeated within a passage of text.
Etymological fallacyTreat a word's historical origin as binding on its present meaning, mistaking a fact about language history for a fact about how today's speakers actually use the word.
Fallacy of AccidentThe inferential mistake of applying a general rule mechanically to a case that satisfies its terms but lies outside its intended scope — treating a defeasible generalisation, carrying an implicit ceteris paribus clause, as an exceptionless universal.
Fallacy of CompositionInfer that a predicate established for one or all parts must hold of the whole they form, without a warranted preservation rule across aggregation, interaction, scale, configuration, or shared constraints.
Fallacy of DivisionCatch the inferential error of attributing a property true of a whole to each of its parts, by testing whether the predicate is one a part can hold in isolation or one that exists only in the aggregation, configuration, or interaction of parts.
False EquivalenceThe fallacy of treating two things as comparably weighted on the dimension a judgment turns on, when they in fact differ by an order of magnitude or by kind — by highlighting a genuine shared feature and suppressing the difference that actually controls.
False PrecisionThe measurement-communication fallacy of expressing a quantity with more significant figures or tighter bounds than the underlying evidence supports — a mismatch between the form of the claim and its warrant, read by audiences as unearned precision of knowledge.
Forensic RhetoricThe Aristotelian speech genre whose subject is past action under judgment — what happened, who is responsible, what remedy follows — fixed by a five-element apparatus (backward time orientation, judging audience, rules of evidence, explanation and exculpation topoi, verdict-form output) that recurs across every institutionalized judgment forum.
Genetic FallacyJudge a claim, practice, object, or idea by source or origin information as though it settled present truth, validity, or merit, replacing the evaluation that is owed with an origin story not independently connected to the relevant criterion.
Guilt by AssociationDiscredit a claim by the disreputable company it keeps — treating shared supporters, origins, or venues as a verdict on content — a relevance failure that lets no truth-value flow along co-occurrence edges without an independent causal or evidential link.
HendiadysA rhetorical construction that presents one semantically dependent idea as two expressions joined in apparent coordination.
Hypotyposis—A rhetorical figure that renders a scene so vivid, animated and immediate that an audience seems to witness it.
HypozeuxisA rhetorical sequence in which every clause carries its own explicit subject and predicate.
Invention (Rhetorical Canon)Systematically canvass the arguments available in a case by visiting a fixed catalogue of topoi in turn, treating coverage of that space — not the quality of any one argument — as the standard of adequacy, before any choice of what to advance begins.
Invitational rhetoricA rhetorical theory seeking mutual understanding through equality, immanent value and self-determination rather than aiming primarily to change the audience.
Irrelevant conclusionProve a sound argument for a proposition that is not the one at issue, then treat it as settling the contested claim — a relevance failure caught by restating the question before grading the answer.
IsocolonA rhetorical scheme that balances the length of two or more syntactically parallel verbal members.
Kairotic WindowTreat effectiveness as the coincidence of a fixed message with a bounded interval of audience receptivity (kairos, not clock-time), so an act delivered outside the window is premature or stale and cannot be rescued by improving its content.
Kettle logicA defensive pattern in which an arguer offers several mutually contradictory defenses at once — each sufficient alone but jointly self-undermining — so the scatter is itself evidence that none is relied upon and the aim is deflection by volume, not vindication.
LapalissadeA lapalissade is an obvious truth—i.e. a truism or tautology—which produces a comical effect.
LitotesAssert something by negating its contrary — 'not bad' for good, 'no small feat' for a substantial achievement — so the gap between the stated-weak negation and the conveyed-strong meaning does the work, typically intensifying under a culturally trained convention the audience must share.
LogosPersuade through the apparent rational structure of an argument — premises, evidence, and inferential steps — so an audience reads the force as grounded in reasoning rather than in the speaker's character or its own emotion.
Memory (Rhetorical Canon)The fourth classical rhetorical canon: the orator's living, indexed archive of arguments, examples, and passages — acquired before performance, organized for retrieval, and reachable under the pressure of a live occasion, not rote recall of a fixed script.
Metanoia (rhetoric)—A rhetorical self-correction that retracts or qualifies a just-made expression and replaces it with a stronger, weaker or more precise one.
Middle Ground FallacyDetect the error of concluding the truth must lie between two opposed positions merely because they are opposed — substituting a positional operation for an evidential one — by asking whether the midpoint keeps its credibility once one position is shown unsupported.
Mistakes were made"Mistakes were made" is an expression that is commonly used as a rhetorical device, whereby a speaker acknowledges that a situation was handled poorly or inappropriately but seeks to evade any direct admission or accusation of responsibility.
Moralistic fallacyDetect the inference that runs from normative undesirability straight to empirical falsity — 'this would be bad if true, therefore it is not so' — foreclosing a factual question on a moral ground without any evidence being weighed, the mirror of the naturalistic fallacy.
Motte-and-bailey fallacyMaintain a strong controversial claim and a weak defensible one under the same label, advancing the strong claim when unchallenged but retreating to the weak one under fire and resuming the strong claim once the challenge passes — so the motte's successful defence is misread as vindicating the bailey.
Moving the goalpostsAn argumentative pattern in which, on being shown evidence that meets a previously stipulated standard, one party revises the standard upward to block the conclusion rather than accept it — repeated so that no finite evidence can settle the question.
Narrative ParadigmWalter Fisher's theory that humans judge value-laden arguments by narrative rationality — narrative coherence (does the story hang together?) and fidelity (does it ring true against experience?) — rather than by formal-logical soundness.
Naturalistic FallacyThe metaethical error of identifying goodness with a natural property, exposed by the open-question argument — for any proposed good = N, 'but is N good?' stays a meaningful question, so goodness cannot be identical with any natural property it merely co-occurs with.
Obfuscation—Obfuscation is the obscuring of the intended meaning of communication by making the message difficult to understand, usually with confusing and ambiguous language.
Package-Deal FallacyTreat a set of positions bundled together only by coalition, tradition, or product line as if they were logically inseparable, so that endorsing one forces endorsing all and rejecting one requires rejecting the whole.
PathosPathos is a Greek term referring to appeal to the emotions and ideals of the audience, eliciting feelings that already reside in them.
Persuasive definitionA stipulative redefinition presented as ordinary or true usage that embeds an evaluative stance and shifts the audience’s attitudes or argumentative commitments.
Poisoning the WellPre-emptively discrediting the source of a forthcoming argument, so an anchoring frame of suspicion is installed first and every later thing the source says is received through it — including any rebuttal, read as defensiveness.
Politician's SyllogismThe fallacious move from 'action is needed' and 'this is an action' to 'therefore do this.'
PolyptotonA rhetorical figure that repeats one lexical root in nearby words with different grammatical forms.
Racial rhetorical criticismA rhetorical-critical approach that analyzes how racial histories, oppression, and logics shape discourse while treating race itself as rhetorically constructed.
Red HerringDeflect a discussion by introducing material irrelevant to the open question, so attention and the conversational floor shift to the new topic and the original question is left feeling-addressed-but-unanswered — the test being whether the new material does any work on the claim that was open.
Relative PrivationThe informal fallacy of dismissing a concern by pointing to a worse problem elsewhere, conflating severity-ranking with action-licensing — since ranking governs how much total attention a problem warrants, not whether it is eligible for any, unless the worse problem's resources are genuinely exclusive.
Rhetorical ListeningSuspend rebuttal and parse another's discourse through three moves — what they claim as their stakes, what genuinely remains contested, and what your own position lets you hear — so an accurate hearing and a firm 'no' become compatible.
Rhetorical QuestionUse interrogative form to perform an assertion rather than seek information, leaving the answer for the audience to supply internally so their self-generated agreement does the persuading — a move whose success rides entirely on an accurate audience model.
Rhetorical SituationRead any occasion that calls a discourse forth through three slots — exigence, audience, and constraints — treating communication as a fit problem so that a misfit traces to a specific misread element rather than to a defect of craft.
Rhetorical stanceCoordinate a communicator's projected persona, treatment of a subject, relation to an audience, purpose, tone, and available appeals so a message adopts a deliberate position fitted to its rhetorical situation.
Simile—A marked explicit comparison that transfers a single salient attribute from a familiar vehicle to an unfamiliar topic while keeping the two distinct, enabling fast perceptual or affective uptake.
Slippery SlopeFlag a consequence-chain argument as fallacious when its inter-step links are held together only by conceivability rather than a demonstrated mechanism, so it blocks a proposal by gesturing at a speculative terminus.
Special PleadingThe fallacy of exempting a favored case from a general standard the arguer just invoked, without a principled basis — a consistency violation under self-serving direction, exposed by asking whether the arguer would grant the same exception to an opponent.
Spotlight FallacyInfer that a property is common in a population because it is prominent in coverage of it — mistaking a selection bias for a base rate, since an attention-allocating channel surfaces cases by newsworthiness rather than by frequency.
Straw ManRefute a weakened proxy of an opponent's view instead of the view they actually hold, so an apparent victory leaves the real position untouched.
SymploceSymploce repeats one expression at the start and another at the end of successive clauses or lines.
Terministic ScreenA Burkean vocabulary-centered frame in which terms simultaneously reflect, select, and deflect reality, organizing attention, attitude, motive, and symbolic action.
TopoiThe pre-formed argument templates of rhetorical invention — a finite catalogue of move-forms (definition, a fortiori, cause-and-effect, sign, precedent) whose form is fixed and content variable — so finding arguments becomes an auditable search through a known library rather than creation ex nihilo.
Toulmin ModelDecompose an informal argument into six named slots — claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal — so evaluation becomes a completeness check that isolates the usually-implicit warrant, where almost every contested dispute actually lives.
Transpositional punA wordplay form that swaps elements of a familiar phrase so the altered expression becomes a comic redefinition of an otherwise unrelated word.
Tu QuoqueCatch the fallacy of rebutting a charge by alleging the accuser commits the same offence — substituting a verdict on the speaker's standing for a verdict on the speaker's claim — by asking whether the dispute was about a proposition's truth or the speaker's standing.
Visual RhetoricThe practice and analysis of how images, typography, composition, color, and multimodal arrangement shape meaning and persuasion for situated audiences.
Writer's blockA nonmedical state of sustained difficulty initiating or continuing writing despite an intention and opportunity to write.
Writing processThe recursive set of cognitive, social and material activities through which a writer develops, composes, revises and delivers a text.
Wrong Direction (Reverse Causation Fallacy)Catch the error of assigning a causal arrow A→B when it actually runs B→A on the strength of a symmetric association alone, by refusing any oriented claim until temporal precedence or interventional response fixes the direction.
Zeugma and SyllepsisOne expressed word governs multiple parts of an utterance, with their grammatical or semantic fit held together or deliberately shifted.