The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings¶
Ross, L. (1977). The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.
Cited by¶
14 citations across 14 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Fundamental Attribution Error
- The construct was named by Lee Ross (1977) in his landmark essay "The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings," building on foundational attribution theory from Heider (1958) and the correspondent inference theory developed by Jones and Davis (1965).
This sourceSeminal essay naming the fundamental attribution error and characterizing the systematic over-weighting of dispositional over situational causes; supports D17-061's framing of the construct's origin.
- The construct was named by Lee Ross (1977) in his landmark essay "The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings," building on foundational attribution theory from Heider (1958) and the correspondent inference theory developed by Jones and Davis (1965).
- Reference-Point Dependence
- The referenced reading is cheaper: the response is a well-behaved function of a difference, and the difference moved because its second term moved.
This sourceDocuments the default of attributing an anomalous response to the responder's disposition rather than to situational structure.
- The referenced reading is cheaper: the response is a well-behaved function of a difference, and the difference moved because its second term moved.
- Responsibility Attribution
- The over-weighting of salient, dispositional agents at the expense of situational forces — the pattern the fundamental attribution error names — is visible as a systematic miscalibration of the control and counterfactual gates.
This sourceSeminal characterization of the fundamental attribution error — the systematic over-weighting of dispositional over situational causes — supporting its framing as a miscalibration of the control and counterfactual gates (854).
- The over-weighting of salient, dispositional agents at the expense of situational forces — the pattern the fundamental attribution error names — is visible as a systematic miscalibration of the control and counterfactual gates.
Mechanisms¶
- Actor Role Map
- Adoption-Barrier Interview
- This is the fundamental attribution error operating as policy: reading non-use as a fixed trait of the user instead of a product of the situation.
This sourceDefines the fundamental attribution error as attributing behavior to stable personal traits while underweighting situational causes.
- This is the fundamental attribution error operating as policy: reading non-use as a fixed trait of the user instead of a product of the situation.
- Behavior-Context Mapping Template
- Its strength is that it makes the archetype's foundational move — separating behavior from the trait story — impossible to skip, which is the core corrective to the fundamental attribution error
This sourceDefines the fundamental attribution error as over-weighting dispositional explanations of behavior relative to situational influences, motivating an explicit separation of behavior from trait inference.
- Its strength is that it makes the archetype's foundational move — separating behavior from the trait story — impossible to skip, which is the core corrective to the fundamental attribution error
- Belief-Desire-Knowledge Map
- It is especially prone to the fundamental attribution error — filling the "desire" and "belief" columns with dispositional stories ("she just doesn't want change") while ignoring the situation the other agent is actually in
This sourceDescribes observers' tendency to overattribute behavior to dispositions while underweighting situational constraints.
- It is especially prone to the fundamental attribution error — filling the "desire" and "belief" columns with dispositional stories ("she just doesn't want change") while ignoring the situation the other agent is actually in
- Causal Contribution Timeline
- It counters the fundamental attribution error
This sourceDefines the fundamental attribution error as overemphasizing disposition while underweighting situational causes.
- It counters the fundamental attribution error
- Counter-Script Review
- It is a working counter to the fundamental attribution error, the reflex to explain others' behavior by disposition ("oppositional")
This sourceDefines the fundamental attribution error as overreading behavior as evidence of stable disposition while underweighting situational constraints.
- It is a working counter to the fundamental attribution error, the reflex to explain others' behavior by disposition ("oppositional")
- Scapegoat Risk Triage Checklist
- This is the tool's guard against the fundamental attribution error,
This sourceDefines the fundamental attribution error as over-attributing behavior to personal disposition while underweighting situational causes.
- This is the tool's guard against the fundamental attribution error,
- Scapegoat Screening Review
- Its strength is that it protects the low-power or last-in-line actor from silently absorbing a systemic failure, and it forces the mitigation and evidence that convenient blame routinely skips — a direct check on the tendency to over-attribute an outcome to a salient individual rather than to their situation.
This sourceAttribution judgments commonly overstate an individual's disposition and understate situational causes.
- Its strength is that it protects the low-power or last-in-line actor from silently absorbing a systemic failure, and it forces the mitigation and evidence that convenient blame routinely skips — a direct check on the tendency to over-attribute an outcome to a salient individual rather than to their situation.
- Situational Attribution Review
- Its strength is countering the deep bias to read others' behavior as character while reading our own as circumstance — the tendency that lets a logistics failure masquerade as a moral one.
This sourceDocuments the attributional tendency to explain another person’s behavior dispositionally while underweighting situational constraints.
- Its strength is countering the deep bias to read others' behavior as character while reading our own as circumstance — the tendency that lets a logistics failure masquerade as a moral one.
- Status-Preserving Attribution
- It leans on the well-documented fundamental attribution error: observers over-attribute others' failures to disposition
This sourceDocuments the fundamental attribution error as overemphasizing dispositional causes while underweighting situational influences.
- It leans on the well-documented fundamental attribution error: observers over-attribute others' failures to disposition
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 14 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:566549689af7 · see in the full table